We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The regulation and control of risks in high-risk arenas is a hot topic. Nuclear power stations, commercial airlines, intensive care units and chemical processing plants both manufacture and regulate risks that, if realised, can have devastating outcomes. Economic life is regularly punctuated by such events, resulting in fatal accidents, environmental damage, ruined reputations and financial loss. As such, the day-to-day control of risks in these high-risk arenas has received considerable research attention. Much of this literature is increasingly being framed in terms of organisational resilience (Sutcliffe and Vogus 2003). Organisational resilience loosely refers to the ability of organisations to contain, correct and recover from failures before these disable their operations and cause serious breakdowns (Collingridge 1996; Weick et al. 1999). The key ideas focus on decentralised processes of adaptation, flexibility and learning (Hollnagel et al. 2006; cf. Boin, Jennings and Lodge, this volume). These processes allow organisations to react to previously unforeseen risks, adapt to changing situations and accommodate unexpected disruptions. These ideas are being energetically explored, both in the literature and in practice. However, at first blush these strategies of resilience appear far removed from the ways in which notions of ‘risk’ are typically instituted in regulatory regimes and formal risk management systems. Indeed, key authors have explicitly distanced typical models of risk management from those of resilience in high-risk arenas (Rochlin 1993: 17–19; Wildavsky 1988). The regulation of risk is commonly seen as a precautionary and forward-looking enterprise (Short 1992).
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.